Co je zdrojem všech věcí?

Adi Shankara commentary on Brahman as the primeval cause of the universe in Brahma Sutras

**Position of Advaita Vedanta** In the Advaita Vedanta tradition, Adi Shankara unequivocally establishes Brahman as the absolute, primeval cause of the universe. While ultimate reality is non-dual and devoid of attributes (*Nirguna Brahman*), Shankara accommodates the empirical existence of the universe by explaining that Brahman, functioning as the personal God (*Ishvara*), acts as both the intelligent/efficient cause (*Nimitta Karana*) and the material cause (*Upadana Karana*) of all creation. **Key Figures and Texts** The primary foundational text for this philosophical synthesis is the *Brahma Sutras* (authored by Veda Vyasa/Badarayana), which systematizes the teachings of the principal Upanishads. Adi Shankara’s masterwork commentary on this text, the *Brahma Sutra Bhashya*, forms the backbone of non-dualistic Hindu theology. Specifically, his commentary on Sutra 1.1.2 relies heavily on texts like the Taittiriya and Chandogya Upanishads to map out the nature of the cosmos. **Distinctive Concepts and Terminology** The crux of Shankara’s argument unfolds in Sutra 1.1.2: *"Janmadyasya yatah."* This aphorism translates to, "That (is Brahman) from which (are derived) the birth etc. of this (universe)". Advaitins distinguish between two ways of defining Brahman here. The origin, sustenance (*sthiti*), and dissolution (*laya*) of the universe represent Brahman's *Tatastha Lakshana*—accidental or indirect characteristics noticeable only from the perspective of the empirical world. Conversely, Brahman’s true, unchanging essence (*Svarupa Lakshana*) remains purely "Truth, Knowledge, Infinity" (*Satyam Jnanam Anantam*). Ultimately, because Brahman cannot literally undergo modification or mutation, creation is understood through *Maya* (cosmic illusion); the universe is an apparent manifestation (*vivarta*) rather than an actual transformation of Brahman. **Direct Quotes** Expounding on *Janmadyasya yatah*, Shankara decisively concludes: *"That omniscient and omnipotent source must be Brahman from which occur the birth, continuance, and dissolution of this universe that is manifested through name and form..."*. Furthermore, he asserts that mere non-intelligent primordial matter (*Pradhana* / *Prakriti*) or random chance cannot orchestrate the highly regulated space, time, and causation observed in the cosmos, necessitating an infinitely conscious entity as its ultimate cause.

• reddit.com
• stackexchange.com
• iitk.ac.in
• chinfo.org
• wikipedia.org
• scribd.com
• swami-krishnananda.org
• wisdomlib.org
• stackexchange.com

quantum gravity models and the initial singularity as the source of physical laws

In classical general relativity, the universe originates at an "initial singularity"—a state of infinite density and curvature where classical predictability and the known laws of physics completely break down. Modern quantum gravity theorists challenge this breakdown. Rather than viewing the singularity as the arbitrary source where physical laws spontaneously begin, this discipline argues that the singularity is merely a mathematical artifact resulting from ignoring quantum mechanics. One prominent theoretical tradition is Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), spearheaded by figures like Abhay Ashtekar and Martin Bojowald. In LQC, spacetime is not a continuous fabric but possesses a granular, atomic structure woven from fundamental loops known as "spin networks". Because spacetime cannot be infinitely compressed beyond these minimal quanta, the initial singularity is mathematically resolved. Instead of a point of infinite density, LQC predicts a "Big Bounce," transitioning deterministically from a previously contracting universe into an expanding one. As Ashtekar notes, quantum geometry creates a new repulsive force in the Planck regime, proving that "Physics does not end at singularities". A second major paradigm is the Hartle-Hawking "no-boundary proposal," developed by James Hartle and Stephen Hawking. Utilizing the Wheeler-DeWitt equation—a foundational formula describing the timeless "wave function of the universe"—they replaced the singularity with a smooth quantum origin. By introducing the concept of "imaginary time," their model treats the earliest state of spacetime as a finite but unbounded geometry. Hawking famously explained: "The no boundary proposal, predicts that the universe would start at a single point, like the North Pole... But this point wouldn't be a singularity". Furthermore, physicist Alexander Vilenkin utilized the Wheeler-DeWitt framework to model the universe tunneling into existence out of "nothing." Because the equation applies even without classical spacetime, it suggests that the quantum mathematical laws of nature may be more fundamental than the physical universe itself.

• grokipedia.com
• sci.news
• psu.edu
• wikipedia.org
• in2p3.fr
• royalsocietypublishing.org
• berkeley.edu
• wikipedia.org
• reddit.com
• hawking.org.uk
• faithhopeandreason.com

the nature of Ein Sof and the first emanation of light in the Zohar

In Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah), the ultimate, unknowable essence of God is termed *Ein Sof* (literally, "Endless" or "Infinity"). This tradition posits that before the creation of any spiritual or physical realm, God existed in a state of absolute limitlessness, entirely beyond human thought, language, or attributes. The *Zohar*, the foundational text of Kabbalistic thought, details this pre-creation reality. It explicitly states: "Before He gave any shape to the world, before He produced any form, He was alone, without form and without resemblance to anything else". The term *Ein Sof* was originally popularized by 12th- and 13th-century figures like Azriel of Gerona, who used it to articulate a Neoplatonic belief in a God devoid of any distinct desire, word, or action before manifestation. In this framework, creation is not an external building process but a profound internal unfolding of divine energy, known as the *Ohr Ein Sof* (Endless or Infinite Light). Because this infinite light entirely filled existence, space had to be made for a finite universe. The 16th-century mystic Isaac Luria articulated this through the doctrine of *Tzimtzum* (contraction). Lurianic Kabbalah explains that the *Ein Sof* "emptied himself" by withdrawing his infinite light from the center, creating a conceptual void where "otherness" could exist. Into this newly created space, a single line of light was emanated. The *Zohar* describes this breakthrough metaphorically as an "act of engraving on the supernal light," which initiated the first differentiation of form from the formless *Ein Sof*. This initial spark of emanation is known as *Keter* (the Crown), representing the primal divine will to create. From *Keter*, the light continued to cascade downward into "vessels" (*kelim*) to form the remaining *Sefirot* (ten divine attributes or channels of energy). Through these emanations, the utterly transcendent *Ein Sof* bridged the infinite abyss, becoming immanent to sustain the created cosmos with divine light.

• wikipedia.org
• equip.org
• medium.com
• hebrew4christians.com
• nvcc.edu

Laozi's concept of the Tao as the mother of the ten thousand things

In the Taoist (Daoist) tradition, the fundamental nature of reality is understood through the *Dao* (the Way), the primordial, undifferentiated source of all existence. A central concept introduced by the ancient sage Laozi in the tradition's foundational text, the *Tao Te Ching* (Daodejing), conceptualizes the Dao as the maternal origin of reality—the "Mother of the ten thousand things". The phrase "ten thousand things" (*wanwu*) is a classical Chinese idiom representing the entirety of manifest creation, encompassing every tangible entity, phenomenon, and being in the cosmos. In the opening chapter of the *Tao Te Ching*, Laozi establishes a profound duality regarding the Dao's nature, stating: "The nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth. The named is the mother of the ten thousand things". Here, the "nameless" (*wu*, signifying non-being or formlessness) refers to the infinite, unknowable void of the Dao. Conversely, the "named" (*you*, signifying being or form) is its maternal, generative aspect that actively births, nourishes, and sustains the physical universe once boundaries and distinctions arise. This cosmology is famously expanded in Chapter 42, which outlines the progression from pure unity to multiplicity: "The Tao gives birth to the One. The One gives birth to the Two. The Two give birth to the Three. And three gives birth to the ten thousand things". In Taoist terminology, the "Two" represents the complementary forces of *yin* and *yang*, which blend dynamically with *qi* (vital energy) to harmonize and construct the material world. Scholars note that envisioning the Dao as a "great womb" or "primal mother" emphasizes an organic, spontaneous form of creation. Unlike a supreme architect who rules from above, the Daoist Mother does not command or possess her creations. Instead, she remains "empty yet inexhaustible," giving life to infinite worlds through natural flow rather than force. Ultimately, recognizing the Dao as the Mother of the ten thousand things teaches practitioners to look past the illusion of separation and harmonize with the underlying unity of all existence.

• euclidphoenix.com
• taoismandmanifest.com
• nomagic.uk
• creatureandcreator.ca
• bopsecrets.org
• medium.com
• organism.earth
• highexistence.com

digital physics and the mathematical structure of the universe as information

The intersection of information theory and cosmology has birthed a paradigm—often housed under "digital physics"—which posits that the fundamental substrate of reality is not continuous matter or energy, but discrete information. Under this view, the universe operates as an immense, algorithmic information-processing system. Rather than treating the "simulation hypothesis" merely as a pop-cultural sci-fi trope of simulated worlds, theoretical physicists treat it as a deep ontological inquiry into whether physical laws are fundamentally computational. A foundational text in this tradition is computer scientist Konrad Zuse’s 1969 book *Rechnender Raum* (*Calculating Space*), which first proposed that the universe functions as a vast cellular automaton computing its own evolution. Edward Fredkin later coined the term "digital physics" in 1978 to describe reality as the output of a universal computer. However, the discipline's most recognizable maxim was formulated in 1989 by physicist John Archibald Wheeler, who coined the phrase "it from bit". Wheeler proposed that "every particle, every field of force, even the spacetime continuum itself derives its function, its meaning, its very existence from binary choices, bits". Closely linked to digital physics is Max Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH). Tegmark argues for a radical Platonist equivalence where physical existence and mathematical existence are completely identical. In this framework, “Our physical world is not only described by mathematics, but it is mathematics”. Distinctive terminology in this field includes *pancomputationalism*—the doctrine that all physical processes in nature are fundamentally forms of information processing—and the *Computable Universe Hypothesis*, which restricts existing physical realities strictly to mathematical structures that can be algorithmically defined by Turing machines. The discourse also regularly engages with Nick Bostrom’s simulation argument and the *self-simulation hypothesis*, which proposes that the universe is a "strange loop" mathematically computing its own realization. Ultimately, these frameworks challenge traditional materialism, arguing that "reality is not made of solid matter but of information structured by mathematics".

• medium.com
• reddit.com
• magnascientiapub.com
• wikipedia.org
• medium.com
• grokipedia.com
• nih.gov

Sunyata and the relationship between emptiness and the source of phenomena in Heart Sutra commentaries

In Mahayana Buddhism, the relationship between emptiness (*śūnyatā*) and the source of phenomena is famously encapsulated in the *Heart Sutra* (*Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya*). The tradition posits that no phenomenon possesses an inherent, independent existence (often referred to as "own-being" or *svabhava*). Instead, all things arise through dependent origination. Therefore, emptiness is not a cosmic void or "nothingness" from which things emerge; rather, it is the ultimate, dynamic nature of phenomena themselves. The *Heart Sutra* frames this philosophy through a dialogue where the Bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara addresses the disciple Śaripūtra. Avalokiteśvara examines the five aggregates (*skandhas*) that comprise sentient existence—form (*rūpa*), feeling, perception, volitions, and consciousness—and declares them to be entirely devoid of self-nature. This insight culminates in the sutra's most iconic assertion: "Form is emptiness (śūnyatā), emptiness is form". Commentaries on the sutra are profoundly shaped by Nāgārjuna, the 2nd/3rd-century Indian philosopher who founded the Madhyamaka (Middle Way) school. Emphasizing precision, Nāgārjuna warned that "Emptiness wrongly grasped is like picking up a poisonous snake by the wrong end". He clarified that emptiness merely denotes a lack of independent essence, not the denial of conventional existence. Contemporary commentators further bridge this dualistic gap. The Buddhist teacher Thubten Chodron explains that form is a "conventional truth" (a conditioned, composite phenomenon), whereas emptiness is its "ultimate nature". They exist as "one nature but nominally different," meaning phenomena and their emptiness are mutually dependent. Similarly, the late Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh utilized the concept of "interbeing" to explain this commentary, noting that a phenomenon like a piece of paper is "empty of a separate self" but full of the cosmos—the clouds, rain, and trees required to create it. Ultimately, Mahayana tradition dictates that emptiness is the very condition that allows the boundless diversity of phenomena to manifest.

• chicagomeditation.org
• qeios.com
• wikipedia.org
• reddit.com
• thubtenchodron.org
• thezengateway.com
• lionsroar.com

Plotinus Enneads on the emanation of the One and the origin of Intellect

In Greek philosophy, specifically within the Neoplatonic tradition, reality is understood not through an act of divine creation from nothing (*creatio ex nihilo*), but through the continuous "emanation" of the cosmos from a supreme, transcendent source. This framework was established by the 3rd-century philosopher Plotinus—building on the teachings of Plato and Ammonius Saccas—and was compiled by his student Porphyry into the foundational text, *The Enneads*. At the summit of Plotinus’s metaphysical hierarchy of realities (the "hypostases") is "the One" (*tò Hén*). The One is an absolutely simple, undivided principle existing "beyond all Being and Essence". The One does not possess a conscious will, nor does it deliberately decide to act or create. Instead, reality flows from it out of sheer necessity because it is absolutely perfect. Plotinus articulates this in *The Enneads* (V.2.1): "Seeking nothing, possessing nothing, lacking nothing, the One is perfect and... has overflowed, and its exuberance has produced the new". Crucially, this emanation does not diminish the One, a dynamic Plotinus famously compares to the sun constantly radiating light without losing its own underlying substance. The first immediate product of this radiant overflow is the Intellect (*Nous*, also translated as the Divine Mind). While the One is pure unity, the Intellect introduces the first layer of multiplicity into the cosmos. The origin of the Intellect occurs through a dual process of procession and contemplation. The raw generative power flowing from the One "turns again to its begetter and [is] filled and has become its contemplator and so an Intellectual-Principle". By turning back to intuitively gaze upon its source, the Intellect realizes itself as true Being. It holds the archetypal Forms (analogous to Platonic Ideas) and functions as the "One-Many"—a unified realm of divine thought. From the Intellect's own contemplative overflow, the third hypostasis, the Soul, is subsequently emanated, thereby bridging the absolute unity of the divine with the diverse materiality of the physical world.

• wikipedia.org
• wikipedia.org
• reddit.com
• utm.edu
• udayton.edu
• mit.edu
• wordpress.com
• thecollector.com
• brinkley.blog
• integralworld.net

the hard problem of consciousness and panpsychist views on fundamental reality

Within neuroscience, the "hard problem of consciousness"—a term coined by philosopher David Chalmers to describe the explanatory gap between physical brain mechanisms and subjective experience—has led some researchers to embrace panpsychism. Rather than viewing consciousness as a byproduct of complex neural wiring, these neuroscientists propose that subjective experience is an intrinsic, fundamental property of reality, much like mass or spacetime. The primary vehicle for this neuroscientific approach is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), pioneered by Giulio Tononi and heavily championed by Christof Koch. IIT serves as a framework for "scientific panpsychism," positing that consciousness is present in any physical system that integrates information. This integrative capacity is mathematically quantified by a metric called *Phi ($\Phi$)*. According to IIT, any system with a non-zero $\Phi$ possesses some degree of subjective experience, implying that consciousness is not exclusive to biological brains and may exist on a spectrum extending down to rudimentary physical systems. Methodologically, IIT "addresses the 'hard problem' backwards". Instead of attempting to derive subjective experience from objective physical matter, IIT begins with phenomenological axioms—the undeniable reality of conscious experience—and deduces the physical mechanisms required to support it. Because it offers a rigorous mathematical framework, Koch has praised IIT as "the only really promising fundamental theory of consciousness". While highly controversial among materialists, IIT has significant practical footing in clinical neuroscience. The theory led to the development of the Perturbational Complexity Index (PCI), an empirical tool utilizing TMS-EEG recordings to measure a brain's capacity for integrated information. By quantifying $\Phi$-proxies, doctors can detect varying levels of consciousness in comatose, vegetative, or "locked-in" patients. This demonstrates how exploring panpsychist views on fundamental reality has generated tangible, life-saving clinical applications.

• wikipedia.org
• sciencedaily.com
• psychologytoday.com
• mindmatters.ai
• neurosciencenews.com
• wordpress.com
• arxiv.org
• wikipedia.org